Paediatric Olecranon fractureOlecranon fractures are uncommon in children, accounting for between 4% and 7% of all childhood elbow fractures. Minimally displaced or undisplaced fractures account for 80% of all olecranon fractures, these are managed with immobilization alone and rarely require hospital admission. Of those fractures admitted to hospital oblique metaphyseal fractures are most commonly seen and are satisfactorily treated with tension-band techniques. ClinicalThe injury is commonly caused by a force transmitted up the forearm after a fall on the outstretched hand. The force may be valgus or varus, the resulting fracture is commonly an oblique fracture through the metaphysis, the direction of which may vary according to the degree of elbow flexion. Other causes include direct trauma. Fractures through the apophysis and the growth plate are much less common and probably arise from similar mechanisms. The presence of an associated bony injury at the elbow is a common finding, with the reported incidence varying from 14% to 77%. RadiologyThe secondary centre of ossification for the olecranon appears at about 9 years old and fuses by about 14 years old. The ossification centre may be bipartite and eccentric, and as the proximal ulna grows, the growth-plate orientation alters from transverse to oblique. Closure of the physis begins at the articular surface and progresses toward the extensor surface of the bone. Just before fusion of the growth plate, the metaphyseal bone develops a sclerotic margin and may be widely separated from the apophysis, resembling a fracture. These vagaries can make it difficult to recognize a fracture of the olecranon in a child, and comparative views of the opposite side are often valuable. ClassificationSeveral classification systems have been proposed for fractures of the olecranon in children. Each of these address certain facets of this fracture.
Evans classification below
TreatmentAppropriate treatment of olecranon fractures depends on:
Approximately 80% of olecranon fractures are minimally displaced and can be managed by immobilization and rarely require hospital admission. Various authors recommended 3, 4, and 5 mm of intraarticular displacement as the threshold for open reduction and internal fixation. This suggests that fractures with 4 mm displacement should be reduced and fixed. This leaves a
"grey zone" of displacement between 2 and 4 mm in which the management is not so
clear cut, and the decision may be influenced by other factors such as, integrity of the elbow-extensor mechanism and the presence of other injuries. It
should also be emphasized that a "step" in the articular surface with only
slight "separation" is potentially far more deleterious to the joint than a
wider simple separation without a step, which may heal with a smooth fibro
cartilaginous surface. Fixation methods
OutcomeMorrey et al. demonstrated that the activities of daily life require 100º
of elbow flexion and extension (range, 30º flexion to
130º flexion) and 50º each of pronation and supination.
Therefore it is only when a significant range of movement is lost, as in the
patients with AVN and radioulnar synostosis, that the functional limitation
becomes noticeable.
It is difficult to
predict in the valgus injury (metaphyseal olecranon and radial neck fracture)
when an associated radial neck fracture will cause an increase in carrying angle, ideally angular
deformity at the radial neck should be reduced. Olecranon Fractures in Children: Part 1: A Clinical Review: Part 2: A New Classification and Management Algorithm. Evans, MC; Graham, HK: J Pediatric Orthop, Volume 19(5).September/October 1999.559 Last updated 11/09/2015 |